Enhancing Contract Management
There is an increasing awareness that contracts – at least as currently used – are not fit for purpose, and that they often work against the quality and effectiveness of the relationship:
- They can’t anticipate or respond quickly to unexpected developments, creating gaps and a rush to try and renegotiate or redefine terms.
- They usually aren’t readily understandable, applicable and usable at the front line – especially where quick decisions are needed.
- Most of all, they can’t capture the crucial subjective Things That Matter.
Whilst contracts will remain an indispensable tool, providing crucial legal and operational detail, something else is needed to help contract and relationship management keep pace.
This is where Value Management can be used to reach a mutually-agreed complement to the contract that focuses on the (primarily subjective) Things That Matter that the contract doesn’t/can’t cover:
- The Three Step Process is used to clarify, personalise and agree the Things That Matter between the parties, expressing strategic value in a shared language: a completely new approach to encapsulating the relationship.
- As well as then keeping these “alongside” the contract, the agreed Things That Matter can be published and circulated so that everyone knows what is valuable and so that actions taken are consistent with what has been agreed to matter.
- This could be global – everything shown to everyone – and/or targeted subsets of Things That Matter highlighted to specific groups.
- The Things That Matter are then reworked into Value Codes, such that agreed priorities are expressed as to how they look in practice and can be added to the contract complement.
Finally, the Value Codes are assembled into a diagnostic: a completely new way of managing the relationship, where – alongside existing contract management activities – the parties evaluate and agree current performance levels, set targets and take action in key areas where this was previously not possible.
At scale, the Value Codes are evaluated by all involved, with the option for them to propose improvement actions; divergence is discussed and resolved; a current state and a desired state are agreed for each Value Code.
As things improve, the contract complement can be updated – a dynamic expression and management of the relationship in a way that a traditional contract never can be.
Featured content:
Our Contract Complement System:
Articles related to Contract Management:
Describing Things That Matter
What Do Things That Matter Look Like? The Things That Matter are at the core of Value Management. We explain what Things That Matter are as follows: “The Things That Matter are anything and everything that constitute Value: Value firstly to end customers, and then – from there – Value to your organisation, your…
Perceptual Positions
The Importance of Perceptual Positions Perceptual Positions are different perspectives from which to view something. Understanding what these positions are and how to use them can be an extremely powerful way to gain insights and understanding that may not be available from your starting or standard viewpoint. Typically…
Value Management Is Unique
Why Value Management Is Unique Artificial Intelligence (AI). Agile. LEAN. Alliancing. Relational Contracting. Collaborative Working. Just some of the initiatives, tools and approaches out there today each trying to attract and excite adherents and potential clients. Where does Value Management fit in? Is it just another one to…
The Current Cutting Edge?
Is This Really The Current Cutting Edge? I recently attended a two-day event for collaborative working professionals and one session on the agenda particularly caught my eye. It was billed as an overview of how a leading pharmaceutical company sought to obtain an “aligned and nuanced” overview…
Missing the Things That Matter
Missing the Things That Matter The main problem in most situations is failure around the Things That Matter. Things That Matter are the specific aspects of what constitutes Value, i.e. anything and everything involved in achieving an outcome (whether making an improvement, overcoming an issue, or maintaining…
Ineffective Strategic Relationships
Strategic Relationships Need to be More Effective The need to improve the effectiveness of strategic relationships is widely acknowledged, and can be seen in: The growth of “relational contracting” and “collaborative working” as disciplines. The increasing number of associated professional bodies and industry associations, many of which we…
Defining Strategic Relationships
What ARE “Strategic” Relationships? However you define and measure value – revenue, reputation, brand, intellectual property, risk management, etc – your strategic relationships are typically those 20% of relationships that contribute directly towards delivering 80% of that value. An organisation’s relationships are often represented on a Kraljic…
Request an invitation
Request an invitation to self-diagnose the symptoms of what’s not working in your strategic relationship by sending us the following information.